Hope Foundation Conference May 22, 2008
Posted by mirish in Leadership.add a comment
‘Failure Is NOT an Option’
Florida Conference
Improving Achievement without Test Prep
· Need to give students more opportunities to demonstrate knowledge and understanding, authentically.
· Don’t fixate on the form of state tests or practice the test.
· Need to find practical ways to give authentic assessment and a practical amount.
· Students with learning disabilities struggle the most with lower level questions because of their disability yet, that’s how we teach them until we dill and kill.
· Sevel or eight of Marzan’s nine teaching strategies are geared towards meaning not just knowledge.
· ‘Schooling By Design’
· Identify essential questions at grade level meetings starting with Science and S.S.
Leading Sustainability
· Water and bananas feed the brain and keep it hydrated to increase achievement.
· Achievement needs trial and error, leadership, changes.
Differentiating Instruction Chapter 6: Differentiating for Higher order Learning February 11, 2008
Posted by mirish in Math Instruction.1 comment so far
This chapter discussed tactics that are most appropriate for more advanced mathematics in Grades 5 through 8. Math instruction should be more grounded in real-world experiences and applied applications of mathematics to solve problems. In anchored instruction applied mathematics from Grade 5 through Grade 8 is “made concrete” by using real-world story problems coupled with video vignettes. These video anchors are highly motivating and provide some “emotional intensity,” leading students into increased involvement with the problem and toward problem solution. Researchers have also coupled the use of these video anchors with subsequent applied tasks based on the video story. A web site that has information about an anchored instruction curriculum is available at:
http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/projects/funded/jasper/jasperhome.html
There are other ways to teach mathematics in an “applied” fashion. Pgs 113 and 114 discuss a Teacher’s Bank and checkbook.
Pgs. 115 through 120 discuss the PASS strategy. This strategy helps students sort through and discover strategies that work best for them in a series of thirty minute lessons.
Differentiating Math Chapter 5: Differentiating for Elementary Word Problem Solving February 11, 2008
Posted by mirish in Math Instruction.3 comments
This chapter covered strategies to improve a student’s metacognition which means “thinking about thinking”; it is also defined as planning and monitoring how one performs a task.
In metacognitive instruction, students are taught to specifically plan their thinking and subsequently monitor their own performance of those steps. If math teachers can teach the steps that a student must engage in to complete a math problem, that student will be better able to plan the stops in the problem and to monitor his or her progress in that problem. This will lead to higher math achievement.
Bender explained once again that students with learning disabilities will struggle in math. They will struggle with metacognition because they have difficulty with organization and planning tasks. Thus, specification of these steps for the student allows the student to “think about his or her thinking” in solving the problem and in monitoring his or her performance.
Bender presented a few strategies that could be used:
1. RIDD
Read the Problem
Imagine the Problem
Decide What to Do
Do the Work
2. STAR Learning Tactic
Search the Word Problem
Translate the words into an equation in picture form
Answer the problem
Review the solution
3. SQRQCQ Tactic: A student’s reading skills can directly hinder his or her achievement in mathematics. Therefore, teachers of mathematics must also teach reading, and one way to do this is to provide students with a graphic organizer that will assist them in seeing concepts and operations in the problem.
a. Survey: Read the problem quickly to get a general understanding of it
b. Question: Ask what information the problem requires.
c. Read: Reread the problem to identify relevant information, facts, and details needed to solve it.
d. Question: Ask what must be done to solve the problem: “What operations must be performed and in what order?”
e. Compute: Do the computations and compute a solution.
f. Question: Ask whether the solution process seems correct and the answer reasonable.
4. Schema-Based Instruction: Pages 101-106 discuss the use of schemas. Students are provided schematic diagrams, and their task is to “fill them in” during their reading and solving of a word problem.
Page 107 gave a very good idea for an activity that could be planned for a tear out group. Students act out word problems in a short play.
Differentiated Math Chapter 4: Differentiating for conceptual Development and Deep Understanding February 8, 2008
Posted by mirish in Math Instruction.7 comments
Students need to develop a deep understanding of mathematics and they can do this as long as they have mastered the prerequisite skills for a particular problem and are supported by the teacher and curriculum as they “ construct” further understanding of the math problems. Teachers are facilitators who provide appropriate supports and should withdraw those supports and allow students to work more independently as they mature in their cognitive understandings of math concepts.
One way to accomplish this is to use a cognitive guided visualization strategy. First, working in a small tear out group, the teacher would provide a problem for the students to consider. Next, the teacher should allow students to solve the problem in their own way. Then, the teacher will have the students share they strategies they used. Finally, using focused questions with students who got an incorrect answer, the teacher should guide them through the visualization process to arrive at the correct answer.
Another strategy is to use Scaffolded Instruction. The teacher assists individual students by providing prompts and guidance that is tailored to their specific needs. On page 75, Bender suggests guidelines to be used:
1. Identify what students know
2. Begin with what students can do.
3. Help students achieve success quickly
4. Help students to ‘be’ like everyone else.
5. Know when it’s time to stop
6. Help students be independent when they have command of the activity.
Bender presented ways to scaffold such as word problem mapping and graphic representations of word problems on pages 77-83
Another teaching strategy that was presented was Process Mnemonics to Teach Computation. On pages 87-90 Bender gives an example for subtraction, addition, multiplication, and division. At Washington Elementary I have seen teachers use a mnemonic for rounding. That mnemonic is called “Bullies and Wimps.” I was very impressed when it was presented and it seemed to be extremely effective.
Differentiated Math Chapter 3: Differentiating for Abstract Math Comprehension February 8, 2008
Posted by mirish in Math Instruction.5 comments
This chapter covered 3 teaching strategies that could be used by teachers to help struggling students and to differentiate instruction.
1. The heart of this chapter is the use of a specific teaching strategy labeled CSA. CSA stands for Concrete, Semi-Concrete, and Abstract. This is one way to offer varied instruction and meet the needs of all students. CSA is referred to as the “mental tool” view of math instruction, which suggests that mental images of mathematic equation or problems may best be formed using physical materials or concrete objects. Students need to “visualize” math problems in order to understand them. Clearly, concrete objects or pictorial representations of them can greatly assist in this visualization process.
Learning to use concrete objects and semi-concrete representations is a prerequisite to abstract learning from many students; and for students who struggle in math, use of CSA instructional approaches can be critical. Many students with learning disabilities exhibit visual and auditory perception problems that negatively affect mastery of math. The use of CSA can foster efficient learning of math concepts and provide these learners with strategies to solve problems in every math area.
The concrete level is the lowest level of comprehension. This involves the use manipulative objects during instruction. Some examples would be using tally marks for numbers, manipulatives that can readily be configured to portray the concept , circles divided into fractional parts, or even edibles such a an orange divided into segments. These manipulatives should be accompanies with a worksheet for students to record results of problem solving.
Semi-concrete level uses representation of concrete object is instruction, such a s drawings of objects. This level uses no hands-on support materials. Worksheets for activities at this level should have graphic representations on them, as well as spaces for students to draw their own.
Bender points out that whenever a teacher gives a concrete or semi-concrete demonstration they should stress the relationship to the math concept under discussion.
Abstract thinking should be the teacher’s overall goal. In the abstract phase, mathematics problems without any representations are used, but such worksheets also can be constructed to include space on the sheet for students to develop their own representation of the problem. Bender gives many ideas and examples for teachers on pages 51-59.
2. Another teaching strategy covered in this chapter was the Errorless Learning Procedures. This strategy emphasizes that children require high levels of success in order to be motivated to continue their work in any curriculum area. Psychologists indicate that students need to succeed at least 85 percent of the time in order for learning to take place. An errorless learning procedure is an instructional procedure that precludes students from performing an incorrect response. Thus the students experience much higher success in learning.
These procedures seem most viable in cooperative learning activities and one-on –one teaching situations. Three procedures that were presented were: prompting, time delay, and cover, copy, compare. The last tactic seemed most practical. Copy, cover, compare follows a process where students copy the solution to a math problem such as a math fact or equation, the student then covers all examples and tries to write the fact or equation from memory. Finally the student compares what they wrote with the original fact or equation to make sure it was correct.
3. A third teaching strategy that was presented was called Classwide Peer Tutoring For Differentiated Instruction. This strategy will only be effective if a teacher designates a certain amount of time each day for the tutoring experience. During this time students are put into pairs and one at a time they serve as a “tutor.” The tutor will present math facts, equations, or problems on flash cards and record the responses. Student progress should be charted each day. The teacher is a facilitator and helps students when needed. Obviously, teachers could have each pair working at a different level or on a different concept or skill. Bender points out that this tactic allows teachers to truly individualize their lessons for an entire classroom.
Leadership by Dr. Tom Osborn November 2, 2007
Posted by mirish in Leadership.7 comments
On November 1, 2007, I attended a TeamMates Mentoring conference call where Dr. Tom Osborn spoke about leadership. He spoke about his leadership not from his viewpoint rather, from the viewpoint of many of his players and assistant coaches. He spoke about six areas of leadership that he was able to effectively implement which helped him be a successful leader.
1. He made it a point to know every player’s name and generally the names of their family members. This was important because it made the players feel cared for and valued. He referenced the Bible and its use of the word ‘agape’ which means to view someone in a positive regard.
2. He created and maintained consistency. Leaders need to be consistent and routines and core values cannot change. As a football coach he displayed this consistency and used these routines whether they won or lost.
3. He emphasized character. The players he recruited needed to have good character to be offered a scholarship. Later in his career they had a theme of the week that was focused on character.
4. He was positive and proactive. He caught people doing things right and reinforced it. The best way to change behavior is to offer positive encouragement whereas; the worst way is to constantly criticize. He stated that many kids live in a negative world and need positives in their life.
5. He developed a common, consistent philosophy. His coaching staff developed a mission statement and revised it every year. One year the coaching staff had three points to their mission statement. The first was to model sound character, second to promote a vision of what’s possible, and the third was to be accountable to god by fully developing what he had given them.
6. He was honest and had integrity. He pointed out that when he recruited he avoided making promises about the amount of playing time a player would get or when they would start.
During the final segment Dr. Tom referred to the book, “How full is Your Bucket,” written by Tom Rath and Don Clifton. He explained that you can dip from someone’s bucket by making negative statements or add to their bucket with positive statements. He stated that for every negative statement that you give someone you need to make three positive statements to make up for it. In close relationships the ratio is five to one. Dr. Tom stated the importance of giving compliments and recognizing achievement to help create positive people. He pointed out that positive people display; increased productivity, better relationships, better ratings from customers, and better safety records.
He also referenced a study of a fourth grade math class. The study found that those students who were given positive reinforcement improved their achievement by 71%, those students who were criticized improved their achievement by 19%, and those students who were ignored improved their achievement by only 5%.
I found this conference call to be extremely motivational. Over the years Dr. Tom has showed me that his success was not simply due to his knowledge of the game of football. A large part of that success can be credited to his qualities of leadership and they may have made the biggest difference.
Differentiating Math Instruction- Chapter 2: Planning for DI October 18, 2007
Posted by mirish in Uncategorized.2 comments
I was very excited after reading this chapter which had this overall theme: Differentiating a classroom for math instruction must begin in the lesson-planning phase.
This chapter quickly and easily answered the question, “How do I differentiate?” The guess, assess, and tear away method looks as it can easily be implemented. The difficulty, skill, and time will go into planning the tiered activities.
Bender did a very good job of explaining how today’s classroom is different than yesterdays.
Highly structured direct instruction lessons were possible in classes that involved only a small number of children and a small range of academic diversity. The problem today is that a typical classroom has a high range of academic diversity makes it impossible for a teacher to teach effectively using only one instructional format.
Bender answered another important question. ‘Where do I start?’ Here’s how he answered:
“Get started by choosing an area of math that the students know well and plan to differentiate one lesson at a time. He suggests setting a goal of differentiation 3 lessons per week.”
William Bender introduces a teaching strategy called Guess, Assess, and Tear Out. This is a lesson-planning approach that allows teachers to use the traditional direct instructional steps as the basis for instructional planning, while increasing the variety of activities offered for students who need alternative instructional approaches because of their diverse learning needs. After the beginning of phase of instruction (anticipatory set, orientation, etc…) the teacher guesses which students already understand the concept and she quickly assesses to see if they do with one or two questions. She then tears them away from the whole group and provides them with a tiered lesson. Bender recommends having this group work with other students who do not yet understand the concept so that they can learn from other students. One concern that Bender points at that teachers have is placing students in an unsupervised environment. He recommends having this group work in one corner of the room and not tearing out students who cannot work in this environment.
The teacher can now move onto the instructional phase with a smaller group. After the instructional phase the teacher uses the guess, assess, and tear out steps again. This group will also work on a tiered activity and the group may work with the first torn away group. This will allow the teacher to work with a small group of students on teacher guided practice.
Bender points out that teachers need to have learning centers or other activities prepared for students when they complete their tiered activity.
One last important note, and possibly the greatest benefit, is that the main lesson for the students who are never tore away needs to be as interesting and appealing as any of the tiered lessons for the tore away groups.
Differentiating Math Instruction- Pgs. 15-25 October 18, 2007
Posted by mirish in Math Instruction.add a comment
Below is my summary of the latter half of Chapter One which focused on Number Sense. I’ve already had good conversations with teachers about the points that Bender made in these pages. He makes a lot of sense and our Math Committee is considering changing or adding to our school improvement goal.
The concept of number sense may be as fundamental in learning mathematics as phoneme instruction has become in learning to read.
Without number sense, the child may never succeed in math at even the lowest levels since concepts such as numeration, addition, or subtraction would have no substantive meaning. Clearly, development of number sense is a critically important first step in math instruction.
On pgs 15 and 16 you can find the 5 levels of Number Sense development and a short description for each level.
Pgs 16-22 have teaching tactics for developing number sense.
Many of the tactics can be used throughout the day in other subjects.
One tactic that I really liked would help teach fractions by playing the game, ‘musical chairs.’
Other tactics that I would like to try are:
Giving students opportunities to move since brain research has shown that movement will enhance memory.
When teaching various bar graphs, stand the students in the shape of each bar. Use color because it results in increased attention from the learning brain.
Use edible foods as counters.
Personal learning timelines.
Use songs to help teach concepts such as, telling time.
There are printable worksheets on http://math.about.com
Differentiating Math Instruction – Pgs. 1-14 September 11, 2007
Posted by mirish in Math Instruction.3 comments
I recently began reading Chapter 1 and have read pages 1-14. So far I am finding this book informative and I’m stopping just short of saying it’s fascinating. I’ve always enjoyed listening to workshop presenters talk about how the brain works and explain why things are the way they are. This author has done a very good job of opening this book by explaining why teachers must teach certain ways to improve student learning.
-
Students must be highly motivated to learn math because the learning process is so complex.
-
Teachers must take the time to show the importance of mathematics.
-
A negative emotional response to a particular type of task or fear can in and of itself set up a lack of higher brain function involvement with the problem.
-
Math instruction will be built almost entirely on prerequisite learned skills thus, the importance of mastery prior to moving on to higher level skills.
-
Fewer problems that are similar in structure and that allow students to develop deep understanding is preferable to many problems of varying types.
One reason why I am excited to continue reading this book is because the author is presenting teaching ideas and examples that are applicable in the classroom. The ideas in this chapter should be considered when planning instruction.
-
Use three or more intelligences to address in the presentation of new information.
-
Teacher to both brain hemispheres by including “visualization” activities, number chants, or rhythms.
-
On every day of instruction, teachers should develop some movement-based activity to represent concepts.
-
Teachers should address, explicitly and repeatedly, the bid ideas in each math unit.
-
Present new concepts in three levels: concrete, pictorial or representational, and abstract.
-
Teachers should find ways to use “math play” activities to make math less threatening, as well as scaffolding students’ work to assist students in their mathematics learning.
-
Use chants, music, and other novel teaching tactics to enhance memory for facts.
Three websites that I am interested in researching were presented in this chapter are:
- http://school.discovery.com/brainboosters present a brainteaser at the beginning of each period.
- www.ldrc.ca/projects/miinventory informal multiple intelligences inventory
- math.about.com wide variey of math activities and print out worksheets
Differentiating Math Instruction Book Study August 6, 2007
Posted by mirish in Math Instruction.2 comments
This year I read the book, “Differentiating Math Instruction“, by William N. Bender. I have invited my teachers at Washington Elementary to participate in this book study. Anyone else who is interested in joining us in this steady is welcome to add their comments. The purpose of this book study is two-fold. 1. One of our school improvement goals is to have every 3-5 grade student reach grade level proficiency on Math Computation. Hopefully, this book study will help us reach our goal. 2. Professional learning communities collaborate about best instructional practices. It is my goal to create a strong collaborative blog site. Please, join me on this maiden voyage.